Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

Professional Ethics, Legal Duty to the Court and Clients, Dominus Litis and Correspondence with the Court

HH86-12 : ELIJAH KASEZA vs LANGTON KASEZA and WINNIE MURAPE
Ruled By: MAVANGIRA J

This matter was initially set down for hearing on 11 June 2009 on which date it was postponed to 10 July 2009. It was again postponed a number of times and was finally heard on 3 February 2011 after which date the court called for supplementary heads of argument from ...
More

Appealed
HH46-09 : MATTHEW MBUNDIRE vs TYRONE SIM BUTTRESS
Ruled By: CHATUKUTA J

At the conclusion of the trial, I directed that the parties file closing submissions by close of business on 31 October 2008. The plaintiff filed his submissions timeously. Despite numerous reminders to the defendant's counsel, the defendant did not file his submissions. I have therefore proceeded to prepare my judgment ...
More

Appealed
HH94-12 : ERIC MUSUNDIRE vs OK ZIMBABWE
Ruled By: BERE J

At the close of the defendant's case I requested the two legal practitioners to file written submissions. I appreciate the detailed and well-thought submissions presented.
More

Appealed
HH211-10 : VIRGINIA CHIKADAYA [in her capacity as The Executrix Dative of Cyril Chikadaya] vs CLADIOS CHENGA and ZAKEYO CHIKADAYA and BEAUTY MPOFU and REGISTRAR OF DEEDS
Ruled By: KUDYA J

On 13 March 2001, in case No.11678/1998, the second defendant filed a letter dated 6 February 2001 of his change of address of service from the property in dispute to 15, 733-75 Close, Sunningdale 2….,.
More

HH159-12 : URMILLA GIGA vs ALBION PROPERTIES and MESSENGER OF COURT HARARE and APPLISET INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD
Ruled By: UCHENA J

The applicant was the first respondent's tenant at Number 5 Albion House, 74 Harare. She was evicted from the premises without being given 48 hours notice as provided by Rule 4A(1) of Order 26 of the Magistrate's Court (Rules 1980).She seeks an order of this court reinstating her into the ...
More

HH53-09 : ZIMBABWE ALLIED GROUP LTD vs MILDRED AND MATHIAS (PVT) LTD
Ruled By: MAKONI J

Litigants, and legal practitioners in particular, must bear in mind that litigation is not a battle of wits whereby they strive to outwit each other. They should know that the object of the litigation is to do justice. I can do no better than to quote WESSELS J in Whittaker v Ross Anor 1911 ...
More

HH26-08 : MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRATIC CHANGE vs TIMOTHY MUBHAWU
Ruled By: HUNGWE J

This matter was placed before me through the Chamber Book as an urgent application on March 10, 2008. The applicant seeks the following provisional order against the respondent:“Pending confirmation or discharge of this Provisional Order;1. The respondent be and is forthwith hereby interdicted and restrained from using the applicant's name ...
More

HHH48-09 : THE ATTORNEY GENERAL vs AMINATA BOMBO and TSHIBASU MUKUBA and BILOLO TSHELA and TSHELA MUKUBA and KABWE KONGOLO and TSHIVUANDI KAFUNDA and BLAISE MUKENGE and MAVIS MUKENGE
Ruled By: BHUNU J

Judicial work is a painstaking job which calls for unwavering dedication to duty. Taking the easy way out..., can easily compromise the ends of justice either way. A judicial officer must not only ensure that justice is done but that it is seen to be done.
More

HH08-12 : LOREEN MASHANGWA vs CHRISPEN BHADHI and TICHA DARANGWA and THE MINING COMMISSIONER GWERU
Ruled By: MAWADZE J

This is an urgent chamber application for a provisional order whose interim relief sought is stated as follows:“INTERIM RELIEF GRANTEDPending determination of the lawful owner of ANSH NORTH situated on the following map coordinates;Point A 0187976 ...
More

HH83-12 : BASIMON TAPFUMANEYI vs NOAH MUSARURO (in his capacity as Executor of the Estate Late Vasco Musaruro) AND FIVE OTHERS
Ruled By: MAWADZE J

The plaintiff's prayer is not drafted in a clear and astute manner expected of a legal practitioner. The property in issue is clumsily identified..., and the parties not precisely cited. The language used is not succinct.
More

HH104-12 : EXPOSALES (PRIVATE) LIMITED vs POLY PACKAGING (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Ruled By: MUTEMA J

The legal practitioner for the respondent came to court not dressed in the required attire-prompting the court to invoke the age old custom of saying that "I don't see you and I don't hear you."
More

HH22-09 : JONAH MUFUNDISI vs GLORIA RUSERE
Ruled By: BERE J

It is most unusual that a legal practitioner would advise his law firm to refuse to accept court process for whatever reason. I think such an attitude represents a brutal act to the rules of professional ethics as I perceive them. It is an act which is clearly calculated to subvert court process and ...
More

HH23-09 : TUVIGARI INVESTMENTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED vs LUCY CHIREMBA (nee Gotora) AND TWO OTHERS
Ruled By: BERE J

The applicant's counsel attacked the first respondent's counsel for having snatched a judgment...,. I must point out that allegations of snatching at judgments are of serious magnitude for they portray the accused law firm in bad light. Legal practitioners must be careful to avoid casting aspersions on fellow legal practitioners in their quest to build ...
More

HH02-12 : SWANDALE PROPERTIES (PRIVATE) LIMITED vs VENENCIA MADAKE AND MUNICIPALITY OF HARARE
Ruled By: MUTEMA J

It behoves me to utter some strictures concerning the applicant's improper conduct of embarking upon a multiplicity of suits regarding the same subject matter. There was the appeal against the interdict against it by the magistrate's court, the application for the contempt of court as well as the present one for cancellation of the lease ...
More

SC29-12 : ANNA MARANGE vs JOSEPH CHIROODZA
Ruled By: MALABA DCJ

This is a matter which reflects a high degree of negligence on the part of the legal practitioners who handled the applicant's appeal.
More

HH32-12 : ZELLCO CELLULLAR PL vs NETONE CELLULLAR PL and DR CALLISTUS NDLOVU and REWARD KANGAI and LYNDON NKOMO
Ruled By: GOWORA J

Subsequent to hearing this matter, after having researched on the subject, I requested the parties to address supplementary heads of argument for the benefit of the court.The respondents were kind enough to oblige and I am indebted to Miss Moyo for having taken the time to prepare and file the ...
More

HH111-08 : RAILWAY ARTISANS UNION and RAILWAY ASSOCIATION OF YARD OPERATING STAFF and ANOR vs RAILMED and NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE and RAILWAYS EMPLOYMENT COUNCIL
Ruled By: GOWORA J

This matter was initially placed before me under a certificate of urgency. As the final and interim relief sought on the provisional order were the same, I wrote an endorsement on the face of the application querying the manner in which the relief had been framed.The letter of explanation was ...
More

HH29-09 : FIDELIS CHIRAMBA and OTHERS vs MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS N.O. and COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE and OFFICER COMMANDING CID HOMICIDE, Chief Supt MAKEDENGE and DETECTIVE CONSTABLE MUUYA
Ruled By: HUNGWE J

In this application, the applicants seek an order -(a) Declaring their arrest and continued detention unlawful;(b) Requiring the respondents and all those calling through them or acting on their behalf to permit the applicants access to medical treatment at medical centres of their choice;(c) Directing the respondents or anyone calling ...
More

Appealed
SC28-10 : JONATHAN MOYO and MOSES NDLOVU and PATRICK DUBE and SIYABONGA NCUBE vs AUSTIN ZVOMA N.O., CLERK OF PARLIAMENT and LOVEMORE MOYO
Ruled By: CHIDYAUSIKU CJ, MALABA DCJ, SANDURA JA, ZIYAMBI JA and GARWE JA

Although I would dismiss the appeal, I think that the respondents should not get their costs from the applicants.The respondents used language in their affidavits which was insultive of the first applicant and added nothing to the determination of the questions before the courts. It offended its sense of fairness ...
More

HH101-09 : JULIET MUCHA vs PHILIMON MUCHA
Ruled By: BERE J

Before I conclude this matter, I must comment on the lackadaisical conduct of the defendant's counsel. Upon concluding the recording of evidence in this matter, I implored both the unrepresented plaintiff, and the defendant's counsel, to submit their written submissions on or before 5 October 2009. The unrepresented plaintiff submitted her written submissions in time, but as I write ...
More

HH144-09 : NEGOWAC SERVICES (PRIVATE) LIMITED vs 3D HOLDINGS (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND GIFTCARE ELECTRICAL (PVT) LTD t/a REG ELECTRICAL WHOLESALERS
Ruled By: MTSHIYA J

At the close of the defendants' case, I postponed the proceedings and asked for written submissions from the legal practitioners, which I received as arranged. I am grateful to the two legal practitioners for both their oral and written submissions which I found useful.
More

HH155-09 : VAIDA SIBIU vs BLANTINA BAMU and ELLISON MUKANDI and CHARITY MUKANDI and MARGARET BAMU and THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS
Ruled By: MAKONI J

I must start by commending counsel for the applicant for filing comprehensive Heads of Argument that clearly outline the import of Rule 449.
More

View Appeal
HH161-09 : TINASHE MALVERN MADAMOMBE vs BINDURA MUNICIPAL COUNCIL and DANISO WAKATAMA and IVORY MATANHIRE and JAPHET KABANGA
Ruled By: GOWORA J

In view of the contention by counsel for the respondents, that, legally, a resolution could be issued for an elected Mayor to be removed, I requested that counsel on both sides of the divide file additional heads on the point. This has been done, and I am grateful to counsel for their diligence.
More

HB38-09 : GREENFIELD NYONI vs MRS. L. P. ELMISSING and MR.M. M. ELMISSING
Ruled By: CHEDA J

This is an application for directions in the execution of the provisional order.The salient facts of the matter are that the applicant entered into a lease agreement with the respondents wherein he leased Shop Number 10 Njube Trading in 2003 and another shop in 2005 known as Jika Jika Bar, ...
More

HB56-09 : BENTONS (PVT) LTD vs SWAN PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD
Ruled By: NDOU J

On 27 April 2009, the applicant filed a notice of withdrawal of the notice of appeal. Counsel for the applicant “testified” from the bar that the date stamp of 27 April 2009 by the Registrar of this court is by error. He said the notice of withdrawal was filed on 28 April 2009. He said the ...
More

HH03-10 : ESTHER MWANYISA vs ENETI JUMBO and ISABEL SAMURIWO and MTIKUMBURA MOFFAT and THE CITY OF HARARE and THE MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT and ANOTHER
Ruled By: MAKARAU JP

Judges are public servants, and, as such, they are not to complain about what lands on their plates. They must do justice always nomatter the state of the case that is placed before them I must, however, confess that the above matter is a dog's breakfast.
More

HH24-10 : SAHAWI INTERNATIONAL (PTY) LIMITED and YAKUB IBRAHIM MAHOMED vs JOHN ARNOLD BREDENKAMP and BRECO INTERNATIONAL (PRIVATE) LIMITED
Ruled By: MAKARAU JP

Before I proceed to determine the objection on the merits, I wish to express my disquiet at the manner in which the objection was brought up and the heated arguments that have been characteristic of the hearing. It is my hope that the conduct of the parties herein will not set any precedent for future conduct ...
More

HH40-10 : THE DIOCESAN TRUSTEES FOR THE DIOCESE OF HARARE vs THE CHURCH OF THE PROVINCE OF CENTRAL AFRICA and BISHOP CHAD GANDIA
Ruled By: BHUNU J

Mr. Tranos Goronga, the judge's clerk, is an officer of this court who apparently has no interest in the outcome of this matter. That being the case, he is unlikely to deliberately mislead the court unless he is mistaken. He did not keep a record of the times alluded to in his affidavit otherwise he would ...
More

HH81-10 : MILRITE FARMING (PRIVATE ) LIMITED vs ENOCK PORUSINGAZI and THE MINISTER OF LANDS AND RURAL RESETTLEMENT and FOUR OTHERS
Ruled By: UCHENA J

A legal practitioner, as an officer of the court, has a duty to assist it in arriving at a correct decision. A legal practitioner shall not give the court incorrect information, or advice which is, to his knowledge, contrary to the law. He must not conceal material facts from the court or deliberately mislead ...
More

HH98-10 : FIONA EVELYN TAISEKWA JIRIRA vs ZIMCOR TRUSTEES LIMITED and REGISTRAR OF DEEDS
Ruled By: MAKARAU JP

Before I dispose of this matter, it is pertinent, in my view that I advert to one other issue of general concern. Litigants, unless they have been legally trained, do not frame their instructions to legal practitioners in legal terms. They are not expected to. Thus, they do not instruct their legal practitioners using terms that ...
More

HH114-10 : IAN SPENCE GRAY and PRINCIPLE BASED SOLUTIONS P/L vs THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS
Ruled By: GOWORA J

When the matter was initially called, it appeared that counsel had not furnished the court with any authority on the issues to be determined. I therefore directed that each of them draft and file supplementary Heads of Argument citing, for my benefit, the authorities being relied upon by the respective parties; and I am ...
More

HH114-10 : IAN SPENCE GRAY and PRINCIPLE BASED SOLUTIONS P/L vs THE REGISTRAR OF DEEDS
Ruled By: GOWORA J

It appears that neither counsel was prepared to research on the issue.
More

HH116-10 : DEBORAH GLORIA KOUMIDES vs PAUL KOUMIDES
Ruled By: MAVANGIRA J

It was apparent that there is great animosity between the parties, and, unfortunately, that animosity had clearly also transferred onto both legal practitioners who constantly “fought” during the trial. At one stage, early in the trial, I had to call them to Chambers because of their unbecoming conduct and remonstrate with them.
More

HH118-10 : JOHN STRONG (PRIVATE) LIMITED and TOBS STRONG (PRIVATE) LIMITED vs WILLIAM WACHENUKA and MINISISTRY OF LANDS, AGRICULTURE AND RESETTLEMENT
Ruled By: GOWORA J

Subsequent to the order being granted, the first respondent has addressed several letters to the Registrar of this Honourable Court demanding a judgment. I have acceded to the request and I give my reasons hereunder.
More

HH153-10 : ACHIBOLD NDIDZANO vs PAULINE GONDORA and HOPEMORE ARUFANDIKA and HARDWORK MUTYENYOKA and SIX OTHERS
Ruled By: HUNGWE J

But the applicant's legal practitioners should have had the presence of mind to advise her Ladyship of the correct position in the proceedings before her were declared a nullity in 2006. It may well be that when he took over the file from his principal…, the applicant could not unpack the various stages each ...
More

HH157-10 : ISAU MUGUGU vs POLICE SERVICE COMMISSION and COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Ruled By: GOWORA J

The manner in which the affidavits were drafted leaves a lot to be desired. Although an attempt was made to respond to the allegations in the various paragraphs, a number of paragraphs were lumped together for purposes of responding to the allegations, and, as a result, it is difficult to make sense of the ...
More

HH163-10 : BISSY BEE (PVT) LTD vs GRAIN MARKETING BOARD and BRUKMARK MICROFINANCE (PVT) LTD and DEPUTY SHERIFF-CHITUNGWIZA
Ruled By: MUSAKWA J

In one breath, Irene Kandawasvika claims ownership of all the attached goods, but elsewhere in the founding affidavit she sates that the motor vehicle belongs to her cousin. It just serves to show how lackadaisical the applicant has been in preparing this matter.
More

HH176-10 : JOYCE CHAGADURA vs SHELLY ANTONIO and REGIS MUVEREGI and DIRECTOR OF HOUSING CITY OF HARARE and SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT
Ruled By: GUVAVA J

After hearing the evidence in this matter, the notebook was inadvertently lost in the Registrars' office. The securing of a transcript has taken some time to obtain and this has accounted for the long delay in finalizing this matter.
More

HH190-10 : NGONI MUDEKUNYE and GLADYS CHAMUTSA and MASIMBA MUDEKUNYE and TAMBURIKA MUDEKUNYE vs AARON EVANS MUDEKUNYE and BERTHA MUDEKUNYE and DEPUTY SHERIFF CHIPINGE N.O.
Ruled By: BERE J

It is my view that when these courts deal with legal practitioners we must operate on the assumption that such legal practitioners are fully aware of their concomitant duty to both the court and their clients. We must regard them as fully fledged professionals and officers, or servants, of the court. But this does ...
More

HH191-10 : SHEPHERD MURAHWI and DEBORAH MURAHWI and PETER SIGAUKE and OTHERS vs MS MAGWENZI and ARROSUM CONSTRUCTION (PVT) LTD and DIVINE HOMES (PVT) LTD and NICANOR ENTERPRISES (PVT) LTD
Ruled By: BERE J

When we adjourned yesterday I had asked counsel to prepare heads of argument to give the court a broader and a more informed perception of the issues that occupied all of us yesterday. Immediately the parties had left my Chambers, and as I embarked on my crash research exercise, I realized I was able ...
More

HH192-10 : AEPROMM RESOURCES (PVT) LTD vs SAMUEL MAZOWE and PATTERSON TIMBA and STEVENSON TIMBA and MAGGIE DITIMA and TONDESAI KAPONDO
Ruled By: MTSHIYA J

On 20 August 2010, I dismissed this application with costs. The applicant has now placed before me a written request for the full reasons behind my dismissal of its application. The applicant says it needs the reasons because it intends to file an appeal in the Supreme Court urgently.I give ...
More

HH139-10 : COLLIN JIMU vs LIFESAVER INVESTMENTS (PRIVATE) LIMITED and DEPUTY SHERIFF
Ruled By: HUNGWE J

The applicant, a self-actor, requested for written reasons for the decision dismissing this application on the date of hearing....,.
More

HH135-10 : TREVOR GIFFORD vs I. MUGOMBA and MUYESU and RONALD MUCHENGA and COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE
Ruled By: CHIWESHE JP

Papers received from both the applicant and the first respondent during the course of writing of this judgement confirm my construction of the history of the farm and the identification of subdivision 17 as the property to which the present dispute relates. I am indebted to both counsel for their prompt responses in that regard.
More

HH199-10 : Z. MEREKI vs FORRESTER ESTATE (PVT) LTD
Ruled By: MAKONI J

In my view, the conduct of the applicant's legal practitioners is beyond reproach. They did what they could in the circumstances. They directed correspondence to the address provided by the applicant. When they did not receive a response they proceeded to renounce agency.
More

HH206-10 : STANBIC BANK ZIMBABWE LIMITED vs FLAIR FURNITURE COMPANY (SUCCESSORS) LIMITED
Ruled By: MTSHIYA J

I am indebted to counsel for the defendant for clearly highlighting the main reasons behind the defendant's refusal/rejection of the plaintiff's claim. ...,. I believe the reasons are indeed in line with the issues listed for determination at the pre-trial conference. I shall therefore deal with each of those summarised reasons and in so doing, ...
More

HH206-10 : STANBIC BANK ZIMBABWE LIMITED vs FLAIR FURNITURE COMPANY (SUCCESSORS) LIMITED
Ruled By: MTSHIYA J

I am indebted to counsel for the defendant for clearly highlighting the main reasons behind the defendant's refusal/rejection of the plaintiff's claim. ...,. I believe the reasons are indeed in line with the issues listed for determination at the pre-trial conference. I shall therefore deal with each of those summarised reasons and in so doing, ...
More

HH208-10 : MIKE CHIVHANGANYE and OLIVIA CHIVHANGANYE vs OACRIDGE PROPERTIES (PVT) LTD and THE HONOURABLE MAGISTRATE CHIBANDA (N.O.)
Ruled By: MUTEMA J

On 31 August, 2010 I dismissed with costs an urgent chamber application on the ground that the matter was not urgent. The applicants have noted an appeal to the Supreme Court and have asked for the written reasons on which the dismissal was predicated. These are they.
More

HH234-10 : RODGERS MADANGURE vs SHATO LUFEYI and DAYNDALE ENTERPRISES (PRIVATE) LIMITED and MUGEJO MAKONI
Ruled By: GOWORA J

In my view, it is particularly reprehensible for a legal practitioner to launch proceedings clothed with a semblance of authenticity which proceedings are averred at seeking relief to subvert the compliance by a party with an order of this court.
More

HH246-10 : IN RE PARSHOTAM and IN RE CHIBVEMBE and IN RE CHIDZIKWE vs x
Ruled By: PATEL J and GUVAVA J

Following jurisdictional queries raised in January 2010, the learned magistrate eventually responded on the 22nd of September 2010. There is no explanation for his inordinate delay in responding.
More

Appealed
HHH262-10 : ZIMBABWE POSTS (PVT) LTD vs COMMUNICATION AND ALLIED SERVICES WORKERS UNION OF ZIMBABWE
Ruled By: MUTEMA J

It also behoves me to remark that I hope that counsel for the applicant will not charge his client any fees regarding this aborted application.
More

Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top