Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

Constitutional Rights re: Arrest, Detention and Security iro Constitutional Obligations of Security Forces & Personnel

SC11-12 : JESTINA MUKOKO vs THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL
Ruled By: CHIDYAUSIKU CJ, MALABA DCJ, SANDURA JA, ZIYAMBI JA and GARWE JA

This case is about a permanent stay of a criminal prosecution because of torture and inhuman and degrading treatment to which the applicant was subjected by State security agents prior to being brought to Court on a criminal charge.Jestina Mukoko (hereinafter referred to as (“the applicant”) appeared before a magistrate ...
More

SC11-12 : JESTINA MUKOKO vs THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL
Ruled By: CHIDYAUSIKU CJ, MALABA DCJ, SANDURA JA, ZIYAMBI JA and GARWE JA

THE SECOND GROUNDEffect of Pre-charge Abduction and Violation of section 15(1) on Criminal ProsecutionThe second ground on which the validity of the decision to institute the criminal prosecution was challenged was that the prosecution was unlawful because it was based on information or evidence obtained from the applicant by infliction ...
More

HH123-09 : JOHN MANATSA vs ZONDAI CHIMBWANDA and GIVEMORE KARIMAZONDO and WILLARD DZOMBA and CITY OF HARARE
Ruled By: CHITAKUNYE J

The plaintiff's claim was for specific performance of an agreement of sale for the cession of personal rights and interests held jointly by the first defendant and second defendant in a property known as 5706 Muroro Crescent, Glen Norah B, Harare.The plaintiff asserted that he entered into the agreement with ...
More

HB126-16 : MOVEMENT FOR DEMOCRATIC CHANGE–T vs OFFICER COMMANDING BYO CENTRAL DISTRICT POLICE N.O. and THE COMMISSIONER GENERAL ZIMBABWE REPUBLIC POLICE N.O. and THE MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS N.O.
Ruled By: MAKONESE J

In terms of section 219 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe the police have, amongst other duties, the responsibility of maintaining law and order and protecting and securing the lives and property of the people.
More

View Appeal
CC10-19 : THE STATE vs WILLARD CHOKURAMBA (JUSTICE FOR CHILDREN'S TRUST INTERVENING AS AMICUS CURIAE and ZIMBABWE LAWYERS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INTERVENING AS AMICUS CURIAE)
Ruled By: CHIDYAUSIKU CJ, MALABA DCJ, ZIYAMBI JCC, GWAUNZA JCC, HLATSHWAYO JCC, MAVANGIRA JCC, BHUNU JCC, UCHENA JCC and MAKONI AJCC

BRANDIES J observed, in a dissenting opinion in Olmstead v United States 277 US 438 (1928)…, that the Government should be “the potent, the omnipresent teacher. For good or for ill it teaches the whole people by its example.”
More

HH118-15 : MARIA SJAMBOK and BEAUTY CHIRAU vs TRUST CHINYAMA and MINISTER OF LANDS & RURAL RESETTLEMENT
Ruled By: MATHONSI J

As to why Central Intelligence Organisation (CIO) members think they should use their office to intimidate law-abiding citizens and to be a law unto themselves is just about one mystery which is difficult to fathom. There is a pressing need for the authorities to reign in these people and remind them that they cannot act with impunity in ...
More

HB241-16 : FRANCIS MOYO vs COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE N.O. and SUPERITENDENT NYAMAROPA N.O. and CO-MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS N.O.
Ruled By: TAKUVA J

It goes without saying that the first respondent, as the Commander of the Police Service, is duty-bound to ensure that rights of all members are protected. Whenever it appears that these rights are infringed he should take corrective measures to rectify the anomaly.
More

HHB84-15 : THE STATE vs PROUD MOYO and MAVIS MUTEMA
Ruled By: TAKUVA J

The accused persons are facing a charge of murder in that upon or about the 6th and 7th day of March 2011, and at Zimbabwe Republic Police, Sauerstown, Bulawayo, in the province of Bulawayo, Accused 1 and 2 did wrongfully, unlawfully and intentionally kill and murder Samson Ncube, a male ...
More

HHH515-17 : STATE vs MADALITSO RANCHI
Ruled By: TSANGA J and ASSESSORS: GWEME and MHANDU

Section 52, which accords the right to personal security, categorically prohibits violence at the hands of both private and public actors.“52 Right to personal securityEvery person has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right —(a) To freedom from all forms of violence from public or private ...
More

HHH65-18 : THE STATE vs SHEPHERD SHAMBARE and EVERSET MATUNGE and GEORGE KASEKE and STANLEY CHITENDA
Ruled By: CHITAPI J

The applicants apply for bail pending appeal against both conviction and sentence.The applicants were convicted of “murder with constructive intention” as defined in section 47(1)(b) of the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act [Chapter 9:23] by MWAYERA J sitting with Assessors on 31 May 2017 in the High Court, Harare….,.The ...
More

HHMT19-18 : THE STATE vs EDSON PHILLIMON MLAMBO
Ruled By: MWAYERA J and ASSESSORS: SANA and CHAGONDA

The accused was initially charged with murder as defined in section 47 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23].It is alleged that on 7 June 2017, and at Ratelshoek Tea Estate, Chipinge, the accused unlawfully and with intent to kill or realizing that there was a real ...
More

HH229-15 : IZAYI PARK HOUSING SCHEME (represented by ELINAS GUMBO) vs SHADRECK GWENA and OTHERS
Ruled By: TAGU J

The applicant seeks a spoliation order against all the 18 respondents on the following terms:“A. TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHTIt is ordered that:(1) The Respondents are interdicted from interfering with the Applicant's project and business in whatever manner.(2) The Respondents' behaviour and conduct is hereby declared wrongful and unlawful.(3) ...
More

SSC43-17 : JOSEPH CHANI vs THE STATE
Ruled By: ZIYAMBI JA, GOWORA JA and HLATSHWAYO JA

After hearing counsel in this matter we dismissed the appeal against both conviction and sentence. We indicated that our reasons would follow in due course. These are they.The appellant was convicted of one count of murder and three counts of assault as defined in section 47(1)(b) and section 89 respectively ...
More

HH29-09 : FIDELIS CHIRAMBA and OTHERS vs MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS N.O. and COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE and OFFICER COMMANDING CID HOMICIDE, Chief Supt MAKEDENGE and DETECTIVE CONSTABLE MUUYA
Ruled By: HUNGWE J

In this application, the applicants seek an order -(a) Declaring their arrest and continued detention unlawful;(b) Requiring the respondents and all those calling through them or acting on their behalf to permit the applicants access to medical treatment at medical centres of their choice;(c) Directing the respondents or anyone calling ...
More

View Appeal
HH557-17 : ZVIDZAI MARANGE vs BERNARD MARANGE and MINISTER OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT, PROMOTION and PRESERVATION OF NATIONAL CULTURE and HERITAGE and PRESIDENT OF ZIMBABWE
Ruled By: MANGOTA J

Chikwavadombo Mastick Marange [“Chikwavadombo”] died on 8 September 2005. He was the substantive Chief Marange. Two persons acted in his place and stead, each in turn, after his death. These were one Ringisai Noah Marange and one Gilbert Marange.The first respondent eventually succeeded him as Chief Marange.The process of selecting ...
More

HH443-13 : JONAS MUSHOSHO vs LLOYD MUDIMU and THE DEPUTY SHERIFF
Ruled By: CHIGUMBA J

This is an application for rescission of judgment in two matters, HC6627/10 and HC3805/08, brought in terms of Order 49 Rule 449(1)(a) of the High Court Rules, 1971.The relief sought by the applicant, is for an order in the following terms:1. The judgments obtained by the 1st respondent against the ...
More

HHH196-18 : IGNATIUS CHOMBO vs THE STATE
Ruled By: MUSHORE J

This is an appeal against the refusal of bail (pending trial) in the Magistrates' Court in terms of section 121 of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07] on the following grounds:“1. The Magistrate misdirected himself in law in failing to find that 'compelling reasons' demanded by section 50(1)(d) ...
More

HHH374-19 : MUNYARADZI KEREKE vs FRANCIS MARAMWIDZE N.O.
Ruled By: HUNGWE J and WAMAMBO J

The appellant was convicted of rape, as defined in section 65 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23], by the Regional Magistrate, Harare, and sentenced to 14 years imprisonment of which four years were suspended for five years on the usual conditions, on 11 July 2016.The appellant ...
More

SSC117-21 : TAKUNDA MADAMOMBE vs THE STATE
Ruled By: BHUNU JA

This is an appeal against refusal of bail pending appeal by the High Court (the court a quo). The application is in terms of Rule 67 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2018 as read with section 121(2)(a) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07].FACTUAL BACKGROUNDThe appellant was employed ...
More

Back Main menu

Categories