At
the commencement of the trial, the first, second and third defendants amended
their plea to question the plaintiff's locus standi to institute the action in
this matter as his estate had been sequestrated and as such rested in the Trustee
appointed by this court.
In
his testimony, the plaintiff conceded that he had not done ...
At
the commencement of the trial, the first, second and third defendants amended
their plea to question the plaintiff's locus standi to institute the action in
this matter as his estate had been sequestrated and as such rested in the Trustee
appointed by this court.
In
his testimony, the plaintiff conceded that he had not done so because he
transacted behind the Trustee's back, so to speak. He conceded the purchase of
the shares in the second defendant from the Trustees in contravention of the
order of this court which sequestrated his estate and appointed the Trustee.