Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

Negligence or Dolus re: Liability iro Voluntary Assumption of Risk

HH13-09 : BORDER TIMBERS LIMITED vs ZIMBABWE REVENUE AUTHORITY
Ruled By: MAKARAU JP

The plaintiff filed a delictual claim against the defendant, seeking damages in the sum of US$709,948.It was specifically alleged in the plaintiff's declaration that the defendant wrongfully and unlawfully sought to levy import duty on certain resin imported by the plaintiff for its manufacturing processes using an incorrect tariff, causing ...
More

HH33-09 : LOUIS MADZONGO vs GLADYS BESENT
Ruled By: CHATUKUTA J

On 4 December 2007, the plaintiff issued summons claiming damages in the sum of $5,583,250= (old currency) together with interest thereon at the prescribed rate from the date of summons to the date of payment, and costs of suit. The claim arose from a motor accident which happened at Belgravia Shopping Centre, Harare on 15 ...
More

HH47-10 : MUNYARADZI CHIKUMBU vs VIOLET NHAMO
Ruled By: BERE J

It was further contended in the alternative that the defendant was negligent in that before passing ownership to the plaintiff she had not made proper enquiries as regards the true ownership of the motor vehicle. It was..., the defendant's position that after purchasing the motor vehicle she had herself verified the previous ownership of the ...
More

HH146-09 : ELLIOT MUTANGADURA vs T.S. TIMBER BUILDING SUPPLIES
Ruled By: PATEL J

The general rule in our law is that, if a supervening physical or legal factor renders the performance of a contract impossible, through no fault of the debtor, the obligations of the parties under the contract are thereby extinguished and cannot be enforced. See Beitbridge-Bulawayo Railways (Pvt) Ltd v Commercial Union Insurance Company of Zimbabwe Ltd SC91-07. However, this general ...
More

HH162-10 : TRANSMEDIA CORPORATION (PVT) LTD vs BEACH CONSULTANCY COMPANY t /a AVIATION GROUND SERVICES
Ruled By: BHUNU J

Having voluntarily assumed risk over the care of the property, well knowing its value, it cannot, therefore, attribute contributory negligence to anyone. Volenti non fit injuria, that is to say, one cannot be heard to complain where he has consented to the harm being done. Voluntary assumption of risk amounts to liability when ...
More

HB61-10 : LUXION TACHIONA and NONTOKOZO DUBE vs NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF ZIMBABWE
Ruled By: NDOU J

It is trite that the excluding or limiting term must be brought to the attention of the party against whom its protection is sought or otherwise be within his knowledge – Micor Shipping (Pty) Ltd v Treger Golf and Sports Ltd 1977 (2) SA 709 (W)…,.; Tubb (Pvt) Ltd v Mwamuka 1996 (2) ZLR ...
More

HH59-15 : REUBEN MARUMAHOKO and EDWARD CHIMEDZA and NEVER CHIROWAPASI vs PROVINCIAL MINING DIRECTOR, MASHONALAND WEST (N.O) and OFFICER IN CHARGE, ZIMBABWE REPUBLIC POLICE (N.O.)
Ruled By: MUREMBA J

These are people who had obtained a prospecting licence before and had now applied for a certificate of registration. So they knew that it was a requirement of the law to have a certificate of registration before they could start mining activities. That they went on to commence preparatory work in anticipation of the issuance of the ...
More

HB100-18 : ERASMUS DUBE vs ZIMBABWE ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION DISTRIBUTION COMPANY
Ruled By: MAKONESE J

Where a defect or dangerous condition in the conductor or any appliance of a power company, causing injury to a person or persons, negligence does not per se give rise to liability as against the power company. Liability on the part of the power company turns on whether it knew, ...
More

Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top