Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

Practicing Certificates and the Right of Audience before the Courts re: Watching Brief and Foreign Representatives

HH39-09 : WARREN PARK TRUST vs ANTHONY PAHWARINGIRA and NTOMBIZODWA PAHWARINGIRA and DAVY MUTINGWENDE and CHIPO MUTINGWENDE and SALTANA ENTERPRISES PL
Ruled By: BHUNU J

The applicant is a Trust duly registered in terms of the laws of this country whereas the fifth respondent is a limited liability company registered in terms of the laws of this country. The first to fourth respondents are sole shareholders and directors in the fifth respondent, Saltana Enterprises (Pvt) ...
More

HH16-09 : RICHARD ETHEREDGE vs THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDS, LAND REFORM AND RESETTLEMENT and SENATOR EDNA MADZONGWE
Ruled By: GOWORA J

There was no substantive relief sought against the first respondent, the Minister, and, as a consequence, no papers were filed on his behalf. Counsel for the first respondent, who appeared on behalf of the Minister, appeared as a watching brief and took no part in the proceedings. Effectively, therefore I only had one respondent ...
More

HH36-09 : T NYIKADZINO vs JOHN ASHER and MUSUNGA & ASSOCIATES and THE DEPUTY SHERIFF and THE MINISTER OF STATE FOR LANDS AND RURAL RESETTLEMENT
Ruled By: MAKARAU JP

The applicant and the first respondent were before this court on 18 February 2009. Then, their roles were reversed. The first respondent was the applicant in a matter in which, on 26 February 2009, this court issued a provisional order in his favour, restoring occupation of certain farming land to ...
More

SC46-17 : ANDREW MAGARASADZA and 34 OTHERS vs FREDA REBECCA GOLD MINE HOLDINGS LTD t/a FREDA REBECCA GOLD MINE and ASSOCIATED MINE WORKERS UNION OF ZIMBABWE
Ruled By: MAVANGIRA JA

In chambers in terms of Rule 5 of the Rules of the Supreme Court, 1964.For the sake of completeness, the following observation is noted:Despite being served with all the relevant papers, the second respondent did not file any papers in response to this application. It was therefore barred. It also ...
More

Appealed
HH377-13 : KENNEDY GODWIN MANGENJE vs TBIC INVESTMENTS [PVT] LTD and FOUR OTHERS [Case 1] and MINISTER OF LANDS & RURAL RESETTLEMENT & 3 OTHERS [Case 2]
Ruled By: MAFUSIRE J

The in-house counsel would maintain a watching brief.
More

Appealed
CC13-19 : VENGESAI CHIRASHA vs NATIONAL FOODS LIMITED and ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION and JUDICIAL SERVICE COMMISSION
Ruled By: MALABA CJ and PATEL JCC and GUVAVA JCC

At the hearing, Ms Makumbe and Mr Muchada of Dube, Manikai Hwacha appeared on behalf of the first respondent, as a matter of courtesy. The Court was told that the application had been served on Dube, Manikai Hwacha, who, at times, represent the first respondent. However, in this matter they did ...
More

HH442-15 : DAVID WHITEHEAD TEXTILES LTD (represented by KNOWLEDGE HOFISI, in his capacity as Final Judicial Manager) vs JYOTSANAGEN KALA and LISTON CHAKUPA and MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT
Ruled By: MAFUSIRE J

In this application, one Knowledge Hofisi (“Hofisi”) was the final judicial manager of the applicant company, David Whitehead Textiles Limited, which was under final judicial management. The application was for an order that the applicant be joined as the second defendant in an action under the case reference number HC8549/13....,.The ...
More

Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top