Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

Costs re: No Order as to Costs or No Costs Order iro Non-Active Parties & Parties Not Opposed to Proceedings Instituted

HH39-09 : WARREN PARK TRUST vs ANTHONY PAHWARINGIRA and NTOMBIZODWA PAHWARINGIRA and DAVY MUTINGWENDE and CHIPO MUTINGWENDE and SALTANA ENTERPRISES PL
Ruled By: BHUNU J

As the first and third respondents' spouses did not appear to oppose the application they shall not be required to meet the costs of opposing the application.
More

HH281-16 : JOHANNES TOMANA vs JUDICIAL SERVICE COMMISSION and THE MINISTER OF JUSTICE, LEGAL AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
Ruled By: MAKONI J

Since the respondents were not opposed to the order being sought by the applicant, I will not make an order for costs.
More

HH29-09 : FIDELIS CHIRAMBA and OTHERS vs MINISTER OF HOME AFFAIRS N.O. and COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF POLICE and OFFICER COMMANDING CID HOMICIDE, Chief Supt MAKEDENGE and DETECTIVE CONSTABLE MUUYA
Ruled By: HUNGWE J

Because at the end of the hearing there was no opposition to the order sought I am of the view that costs on a higher scale should be reserved for those cases where there is malicious opposition.
More

HHB345-16 : NQOBILE KHUMALO vs THE PRESIDING MAGISTRATE N.O. (MR MZINGAYE MOYO) and THE PROSECUTOR GENERAL N.O.
Ruled By: MATHONSI J

This is a matter in which I would have considered awarding costs against Norman Mugiya de bonis propriis if the respondents had appeared.However, although I had directed the applicant to serve the notice of set down upon the respondents owing to the exigency of the application, which was filed a ...
More

SC22-21 : STONEWELL SEARCHES (PVT) LTD vs STONE HOLDINGS (PVT) LTD and MUTOKO CONSORTIUM and MOSES CHINHENGO N.O.
Ruled By: GUVAVA JA, UCHENA JA and MAKONI JA

Although this would have been a proper case to award costs against the appellant, this Court will not make such an order for the reason that the respondents, being in default, did not motivate a claim for costs.
More

HH842-19 : BARIADIE INVESTMENTS (PVT) LTD vs PUWAYI CHIUTSI and TENDAI MASHAMHANDA and REGISTRAR OF DEEDS and SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE N.O. and ELLIOT ROGERS
Ruled By: CHITAPI J

I need to lastly deal with the question of costs....,.The third and fourth respondents did not file any papers and did not participate in the hearing....,.
More

Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top

For with God All Things Are Possible (Matthew 19 v26)

© 2014. Law Portal Zimbabwe V1.5 . All rights reserved. Powered by RueDigital