Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

HB47-09 - NOMSA MARANGO vs LEONARD NDLOVU

  • View Judgment By Categories
  • View Full Judgment

Procedural Law-viz summary judgment.

Procedural Law-viz summary judgment re eviction.
Law of Property-viz eviction re summary judgment.
Procedural Law-viz summary judgment re bona fide defence to the applicant's claim.
Law of Property-viz bona fide purchaser.
Law of Property-viz mala fide purchaser.
Law of Property-viz deeds registry re proof of title re immovable property iro right to transfer to a third party.

Summary Judgment: Clear and Unanswerable Claims re: Approach

This is an application for summary judgment in which the applicant seeks an order in the following terms:-

“It is ordered that:-

1. Summary judgment be and is hereby granted for respondent's eviction (and all those who claim through him) from the premises situate at number 2918 Emakhandeni, Bulawayo, within seven days of this order, failing which the Deputy Sheriff for Bulawayo be and is hereby authorized to carry out the eviction of the respondent, and all those claiming through him, from such premises;

2. The issue of rentals and the quantum thereof be and is hereby referred to trial;

3. Respondent pays costs of this application.”

The applicant bought, from one Girison Afia, in terms of a written Agreement of Sale, an immovable property known as Stand 2918 Emakhandeni, Bulawayo, on 10 October 2006.

The purchase price was $4,800,000=, which the applicant paid in full. Girison Afia had bought the property at an auction conducted by the Small Enterprises Development Corporation on 23 December 2005. Transfer of the property into the applicant's name was effected on 13 June 2007.

Thereafter, the respondent was given notice in writing to vacate the property, but refused to do so.

The applicant issued summons seeking to evict the respondent from the said property. The respondent entered appearance to defend.

The applicant then launched this application for summary judgment as she believed that the respondent had no bona fide defence to her case.

The respondent opposed the application on the basis that the applicant was not a bona fide purchaser of the property, but failed to establish a bona fide defence to the applicant's claim.

The applicant could not have been a mala fide purchaser since her agreement with Girison Afia shows that Girison Afia purchased the property at an auction conducted by the Small Enterprises Development Corporation. Further, Girison Afia was the holder of title to the property granted in terms of a court order. Quite clearly, the applicant was a bona fide purchaser.

The respondent has no defence at all to the applicant's claim.

This is a proper case where summary judgment should be granted in terms of the draft. In the result, I would grant the application in terms of the draft...,.

KAMOCHA J:          This is an application for summary judgment in which applicant seeks an order in the following terms:-

            “It is hereby ordered that:-

1.                  summary judgment be and is hereby granted for respondent's eviction (and all those who claim through him) from premises situate at number 2918 Emakhandeni, Bulawayo, within 7 days of this order failing which the Deputy Sheriff for Bulawayo, be and is hereby authorized to carry out the eviction of the respondent and all those claiming through him, from such premises;

2.                  the issue of rentals and the quantum thereof be and is hereby referred to trial;

3.                  respondent pays costs of this application.”

 

The applicant bought from one Girison Afia, in terms of written agreement of sale, an immovable property known as stand 2918 Emakhandeni, Bulawayo on 10 October 2006.  The purchase price was $4 800 000,00 which the applicant paid in full.  Girison Afia had bought the property at an auction conducted by Small Enterprises Development Corporation on 23 December 2005.

Transfer of the property into the applicant's name was effected on 13 June 2007.  Thereafter respondent was given notice in writing to vacate the property but he refused to do so.  The applicant issued summons seeking to evict the respondent from the said property.  Respondent entered appearance to defend.

            The applicant then launched this application for summary judgment as she believed that the respondent had no bona fide defence to her case.

            The respondent opposed the application on the basis that applicant was not a bona fide purchaser of the property but failed to establish a bona fide defence to the applicant's claim.

            The applicant could not have been a mala fide purchaser since her agreement with Girison Afia shows that Afia purchased the property at an auction conducted by the Small Enterprises Development Corporation.  Further Girison Afia was the holder of title to the property granted in terms of a court order.  Quite clearly applicant was a bona fide purchaser.

            The respondent has no defence at all to the applicant's claim.  This is a proper case where summary judgment should be granted in terms of the draft.

            In the result I would grant the application in terms of the draft on page one.

 

 

 

 

 

Messrs Job Sibanda and Associates, plaintiff's legal practitioners

Messrs Majoko and Majoko defendant's legal practitioners
Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top