Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

HH31-10 - MOSES WARNING CHADEMANA MAPONGA NHACHI vs THE STATE

  • View Judgment By Categories
  • View Full Judgment

Bail-viz leave to appeal.

Bail-viz leave to appeal re leave to appeal order denying bail.
Bail-viz leave to appeal re prospects of success.
Bail-viz leave to appeal re record of proceedings.
Bail-viz death of presiding magistrate before completion of the trial.
Bail-viz provision of security.
Bail-viz leave to appeal re previous bail applications.
Bail-viz leave to appeal re prospects of success iro previous bail applications.

Bail re: Bail Appeal and Leave to Appeal iro Approach

On 11 January 2010 I dismissed the applicant's application for bail pending trial on the grounds that there were no changed circumstances warranting the granting of bail.

He now seeks to appeal against my decision to the Supreme Court.

For that application to succeed he must show, on a balance of probabilities, that there are reasonable prospects of success.

A perusal of the record of proceedings shows that the applicant keeps on regurgitating and recycling the same old tired arguments which have been rejected by both this court and the Supreme Court in judgment numbers HH07-10 and SC40-09.

The mere fact that the trial magistrate died before completing the trial can hardly be said to be a reasonable circumstance warranting the granting of bail in view of both courts' findings that if granted bail the applicant is likely to abscond. Given the circumstances of this case, the provision of surety is unlikely to change that position.  

Having regard to the fact that the Supreme Court has the final say in all matters of law I find that there are no reasonable prospects of success on appeal.

It is accordingly ordered that the application be and is hereby dismissed.

Application for Leave to Appeal.

 

BHUNU J:   On 11 January 2010 I dismissed the applicant's application for bail pending appeal on the grounds that there were no changed circumstances warranting the granting of bail. He now seeks leave to appeal against my decision to the Supreme Court.

For that application to succeed he must show on a balance of probabilities that there are reasonable prospects of success.

A perusal of the record of proceedings shows that the applicant keeps on regurgitating and recycling the same old tired arguments which have been rejected by both this Court and the Supreme Court in judgment numbers. HH  7 – 2010 and SC 40 – 2009.

The mere fact that the trial magistrate died before completing the trial can hardly be said to be a reasonable circumstance warranting the granting of bail in view of both Courts' findings that if granted bail the applicant is likely to abscond. Given the circumstances of this case the provision of surety is unlikely to change that position.

Having regard to the fact that the Supreme Court has the final say in all matters of law I find that there are no reasonable prospects of success on appeal. It is accordingly ordered that the application be and is hereby dismissed.

 

 

Venturas and Samukange, applicant's legal practitioners

The Attorney General' Office, respondent's legal practitioners
Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top