Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

Bail re: Treason, Unconstitutional Overthrow of the Government and Subverting a Constitutional Government

HH48-10 : ALBERT MUGOVE MATAPO and NYASHA ZIVUKU and ONCEMORE MADZURAHONA and EMMANUEL MARARA and THREE OTHERS vs THE STATE
Ruled By: MAKARAU JP

On the turn, I dismissed the above bail application and indicated that my reasons would follow. I now set them out. The applicants are facing one count of contravening section 20 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. They were arrested on the charge in May 2007. It is alleged against the ...
More

HH184-10 : ALBERT MUGOVE MATAPO and NYASHA ZIVUKU and ONCEMORE MARARA and EMMANUEL MARARA and PATSON MUPFURE and SHINGIRAYI MUTEMACHANI vs THE STATE
Ruled By: MUTEMA J

The applicants are facing a charge of contravening section 20 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] – treason. They have been in custody since May 2007. Ever since their incarceration they have mounted several unsuccessful applications for bail on changed circumstances. The present is one such application, the last one ...
More

HB53-11 : CHARLES THOMAS and JOHN GAZI and PAUL SIWELA vs THE STATE
Ruled By: NDOU J

The background facts are the following. The applicants are jointly charged with the crime of treason as defined in section 20(1)(b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. The second and third applicants are executive members of an organization known as Mthwakazi Liberation Front. The first applicant is the Deputy Secretary for ...
More

HB55-11 : VIKAS MAVHUDZI vs THE STATE
Ruled By: NDOU J

The background facts are the following. The appellant is charged with contravening section 22(2) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] i.e. “subverting a constitutional government.” It is briefly alleged that on 24 February 2001, he urged and suggested to the Prime Minister, Mr Morgan Tsvangirai, to take over or attempt to take over ...
More

Appealed HB59-11 : THE ATTORNEY GENERAL vs CHARLES THOMAS and JOHN GAZI and PAUL SIWELA
Ruled By: NDOU J

The basis of the appeal is that this court did not give due weight to the State's fears that the respondents are likely to pursue their agenda of removing the Government through unconstitutional means. The fear is founded on the premise that: “(i) Thousands of fliers are said to be awaiting distribution by the security department ...
More

Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top