Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

HB108-09 - OSCAR BOMA and BUSISANI TSHABANGU and TAWANDA CEPHAS NYANDORO vs THE STATE

  • View Judgment By Categories
  • View Full Judgment

Bail-viz bail pending trial.

Bail-viz bail pending trial re carjacking.
Bail-viz bail pending trial re armed robbery.
Bail-viz carjacking.
Bail-viz armed robbery.
Bail-viz accused with a pending criminal matter before the courts.
Bail-viz accused with no disclosed fixed abode within the jurisdiction of the court.
Bail-viz abscondment.
Bail-viz flight risk.
Bail-viz risk of interference with witnesses.
Bail-viz propensity to commit crimes.
Bail-viz seriousness of the offence re potential sentence if found guilty iro likelihood of abscondment.
Bail-viz flight risk re seriousness of the crime iro length of custodial sentence.
Bail-viz doctrine of common purpose re equal treatment.
Bail-viz risk of interference with witnesses re evidence of identification.
Bail-viz risk of interference with witnesses re direct evidence linking the accused to the commission of the offence.
Bail-viz attempts to flee at time of arrest re flight risk.
Bail-viz conspiracy to commit.
Bail-viz conspiracy to commit re armed robbery and carjacking.

Bail re: Bail Pending Trial iro Approach, Constitutional Right to Bail & Denial of Bail in the Interests of Justice

This is an application for bail pending trial.

The brief facts are that on the 22nd of August 2009, at the corner of Helm and Athlone Roads, Northend, Bulawayo, the applicants, one or more of them, unlawfully and intentionally, attempted to commit robbery (attempted carjacking), that is, they tried to rob Marvellous Gumire of her Toyota Camry motor vehicle, registration number AAV 4203.

The application is opposed on three grounds -

(a) Likelihood of abscondment;

(b) Risk of interference with prosecution witnesses; and

(c) Likelihood of commission of further crimes.

Likelihood of Abscondment:

The allegations revealed that the applicants planned an armed robbery. They attempted to rob the complainant of her vehicle to go and use it in the armed robbery. They blocked the complainant's way using a BMW that they (the applicants) were travelling in.

The conduct is serious and would call for a substantial custodial sentence.

This factor may induce the applicants to abscond.

Likelihood of commission of further offences:

The first applicant is alleged to have committed this offence whilst on remand for an offence of abuse of office, i.e. he is alleged to have arrested robbers, acting on information from members of the public. Instead of taking the robbers to the police station, he took their property and released them.

This is a very strong factor against him.

The other applicants, in associating with him, are likely to commit further offences with him.

Risk of interference with State witnesses:

Two of the State witnesses were in the applicants company when the offence was allegedly planned. They are known to the applicants.

This is a relevant factor.

Taking all these factors cumulatively, I hold the view that all the applicants are not suitable candidates for bail.

Accordingly, the application for bail be and is hereby dismissed.

Bail re: Robbery, Armed Robbery, Robbery Committed in Aggravating Circumstances and the Doctrine of Recent Possession

The State alleges that the applicants hatched a plan to steal a vehicle.

When the plan was discussed, the applicants were in the company of Lameck Mwanza and Lisben Bvoongwe. The latter witnesses alerted the police about the abovementioned plans. The applicants attempted to rob the complainant of the aforesaid vehicle to use it during the planned armed robbery. Lisben Bvoongwe was in the company of the applicants in their vehicle. Their motor vehicle was fitted with fake number plates.

The first applicant has a pending criminal case at the Bulawayo Magistrates Court.

According to the State, the second applicant misled them on his residential address. He is, further, a cross-border driver with a base in South Africa.

The first applicant is a member of the Zimbabwe Republic Police.

The applicants sped off when the police followed them, and only stopped when the police fired a warning shot into the air.

Bail Application

 

NDOU J:          This is an application for bail pending trial.  The brief facts are that on the 22nd of August 2009, at the corner of Helm and Athlone Roads, Northend, Bulawayo, the applicants, one or more of them unlawfully and intentionally attempted to commit robbery (attempted carjacking), that is they tried to rob Marvellous Gumire of her Toyota Camry motor vehicle registration Number AAV 4203.  The state alleges that the applicants hatched a plan to steal a vehicle.  When the plan was discussed the applicants were in the company of Lameck Mwanza and Lisben Bvoongwe.  The latter witnesses alerted the police about the above mentioned plans.  The applicants attempted to rob the complainant of the aforesaid vehicle to use it during the planned armed robbery.  Lisben Bvoongwe was in the company of the applicants in their vehicle.  Their motor vehicle was fitted with fake number plates.  The first applicant has a pending criminal case at Bulawayo Magistrates Court.

 According to the State second applicant misled them on his residential address.  He is further a cross border driver with a base in South Africa.  The first applicant is a member of the Zimbabwe Republic Police.  The applicants sped off when the Police followed them and only stopped when the Police fired a warning shot into the air.  The application is opposed on three grounds.

 

(a)   Likelihood of abscondment

(b)   Risk of interference with prosecution witnesses, and

(c)    Likelihood of commission of further crimes.

 

Likelihood of Ascondment:

The allegations revealed that applicants planned armed robbery.  They attempted to rob the complainant of her vehicle to go and use it in the armed robbery.  They blocked the complaint's way using a BMW that they (applicants) were travelling in.  The conduct is serious and would call for a substantial custodial sentence.  This factor may induce the applicants to abscond.

Likelihood of commission of further offences:

The first applicant is alleged to have committed this offence whilst on remand for an offence of abuse of office i.e he is alleged to have arrested robbers acting on information from members of the public.  Instead of taking the robbers to the police station, he took their property and released them.  This is a very strong factor against him.  The other applicants, in associating with him, are likely to commit further offences with him.

Risk of interference with state witnesses

Two of the state witnesses were in the applicant's company when the offence was allegedly planned.  They are known to the applicants.  This is a relevant factor.  Taking all these factors cumulatively, I hold the view that all applicants are not suitable candidates for bail.

Accordingly, the application for bail be and is hereby dismissed.

 

 

 

Munjanja and Associates, applicants legal practitioners.

Criminal Division,Attorney Generals office, respondents legal practitioners


Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top