Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

HB105-09 - THE STATE vs LEO MATIBE

  • View Judgment By Categories
  • View Full Judgment

Murder-viz rules of evidence re physical evidence iro murder weapon.

Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re physical evidence.
Murder-viz doctrine of common purpose.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re findings of fact iro witness testimony.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re documentary evidence.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re documentary evidence iro signatures.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re corroborative evidence.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re expert evidence iro medical affidavit.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re findings of fact iro assessment of evidence.
Murder-viz murder with actual intent.
Murder-viz murder with actual intent re doctrine of common purpose.
Charge-viz accomplice re sharing of the proceeds derived from criminal activity.
Charge-viz common purpose re dissociating oneself from the commission of the crime.

Murder re: Murder with Actual Intent, Dolus Directus and Murder Committed in Aggravating Circumstances

The accused is charged with murder to which he pleaded not guilty.

It is alleged that on the morning of 27 September 2007, he wrongfully, and unlawfully, intentionally killed Martinus Jacobus Ooshuyse.

It is common cause that the accused, and one Collin Tsikidze, who is still at large, are former police officers. On the 26th day of September 2007, the accused, and Collin Tsikidze, invited Leonard Dube to the City Centre for a drink. It is also common cause that at this time the accused had already left the force, while CollinTsikidze was still a serving member. At around 0300 hours, they approached the deceased, who was resting, and had parked his car at Pine Brothers Supermarket, between Robert Mugabe Way and G.Silundika Avenue, Bulawayo.

It is the State case that they identified themselves as policemen, and advised him that he was under arrest for wrong parking. They forced him to drive to the Central Police Station to pay a fine. On their way, they forced him to drive to a different direction; he stopped his motor vehicle and asked where he was being driven to.

Collin Tsikidze produced a pistol and shot him once in the head, and he died instantly.

They bundled his body, and dumped it at Badminton Farm, Nyamandlovu. His body, together with his passport, and a Lemonntra Quartz wrist watch, was discovered on the 28th day of November 2007.

Accessory, Accomplice, Common Purpose, Conspiracy to Commit, Co-perpetrators and Complicity re: Approach

The State called Leonard Dube, whose evidence was that on the evening of the 25th day of September 2007, the accused and his friend, Collin Tsikidze, arrived at his house and invited him to accompany them to town to look for money for beer. When he enquired where they were going to look for money, Collin Tsikidze told him that he was a police officer and, as such, he was going to arrest the kombi drivers who drive without permits.

After patrolling the City Centre without any arrest, he suggested that they go back home, but, the accused refused, and suggested that they go behind a place called Alabama near Khami Bar. During their search for traffic offenders, they eventually found the deceased parked..., near Pine Brothers Supermarket at 8th Avenue/R. Mugabe Way. Collin Tsikidze informed the deceased that he was under arrest and ordered him to go to the police station.

The deceased complied.

But the deceased was directed to drive to a different direction altogether. Along the way, he asked where they were going, but, the accused rebuked him, saying: “keep quiet.” A few minutes after that, the accused shouted to Collin Tsikidze the following words: “Lister, finish off this person so that we can go.” He also stated that he asked why he was giving such orders, and the accused responded: “shut up, keep your mouth closed.”

At that juncture, Collin Tsikidze produced a pistol.

Upon realizing this, he opened the door and ran away and eventually found his way home after a Good Samaritan had given him bus fare.

The following day, the accused, and Collin Tsikidze, arrived and gave him R200=, and were now driving the deceased's motor vehicle.

The accused gave evidence.

He stated that he is a former policeman and he knew Collin Tsikidze, who was still at large, as a policeman. On the 26th of September 2007, he met Collin Tsikidze at Pumula, and suggested that they should go to town, and he agreed. On their way, they invited Leonard Dube to accompany them. When they arrived in the city, they walked around until they came across the deceased, who had parked his car near Pine Brothers Supermarket. Collin Tsikidze advised the deceased that he was under arrest for wrong parking, and they ordered him to drive to the Central Police Station. However, Collin Tsikidze diverted him from the route to the Central Police Station to a wrong direction. It is his further evidence that the deceased stopped his car and queried the direction he was now being asked to take.

At that juncture, Collin Tsikidze produced a pistol and he shot the deceased on the head once – and he died. It is also his further evidence that Collin Tsikidze then placed the deceased on the front passenger seat, and he took charge of the motor vehicle. They drove towards Nyamandlovu where they dumped the deceased. Collin Tsikidze searched the deceased and recovered R700= from which he was given R200=. They then drove back to Bulawayo.

On the 3rd of December 2007, he was in the city when he met Collin Tsikidze. They discussed certain issues which are not relevant to the case, but one important issue is that the accused ended up in possession of..., the pistol, and was later arrested still in possession of the said pistol.

Collin Tsikidze is still at large.

In order to determine the guilt, or otherwise, of the accused, it is pertinent to examine his role in the commission of this crime. The accused was in the company of Collin Tsikidze, and they were looking for money. He is a former policeman. Throughout the night, they were looking for money through illegal means as he was no longer in the force, and Collin Tsikidze was not on duty. He knew that Collin Tsikidze was armed with a pistol. They, together, made an illegal arrest of the deceased.

The accused did notice that Collin Tsikidze had diverted the deceased away from the police station route, but did not dissuade him from doing so. When Leonard Dube asked him where they were going, he rebuked him, telling him to shut up. When Collin Tsikidze produced a pistol, he did not stop him. He knew that the pistol is a lethal weapon and how dangerous it is. The accused, as a policeman, was trained in handling firearms. He, nonetheless, did not stop his accomplice from using it. He remained in the car after the deceased had been shot in cold blood. He accompanied Collin Tsikidze when he drove out of the City Centre, and, in his own words, assisted Collin Tsikidze to dump the body of the deceased along the road, during the night. He also participated in sharing the loot. He accompanied Collin Tsikidze back home. He was also a signatory to the written loan agreement when they borrowed the money from Kenneth Matanhire, and gave the deceased's motor vehicle as security.   

As if this was not enough, upon his arrest on the 3rd of December 2007, he was found in possession of the same CZ pistol..., which was used in the murder.

All these factors are a clear testimony of the accused's active participation in the commission of this offence. All these chain of events leave indelible fingerprints and signature of the accused.

We find that the accused fully participated in the commission of this crime.

The accused knew that Collin Tsikidze was armed before the shooting. He did not dissociate himself, like one Leonard Dube. He also continued to be part and parcel of what was going on.

We reject the accused's version of events.

We, accordingly, find that the State has proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The accused is found guilty of murder with actual intent.

Physical Evidence re: Approach


The accused was arrested on..., leading to the recovery of a BSAP 170 CZ pistol, which is the same pistol that was used in the murder.

Findings of Fact re: Witness Testimony, Candidness with the Court and Deceptive or Misleading Evidence

Leonard Dube was confident and was not shaken under cross-examination.

He impressed the court as an honest witness, and, as such, we have no reason to doubt his credibility, and we therefore accept his evidence as a true reflection of what happened on this fateful day.

Documentary Evidence and the Authenticity of Questioned Documents re: Approach

The next witness was Kenneth Matanhire.

His evidence was that on the 17th of October..., the accused, and Collin Tsikidze, came to him for money, and he gave them R3500=.

They introduced themselves as police officers from Pumula where his brother-in-law, Ngoni Chasi, was also working. They left a Nissan Sentra with South African registration number plates as security, and further signed an acknowledgement to that effect.

The acknowledgement was produced as Exhibit 5, and it bears the signatures of the accused and Collin Tsikidze.

Corroborative Evidence re: Approach iro The Rule Against Narratives or Self-Corroboration

The State sought and obtained admission of evidence from the defence of the following witnesses –

1. Albert Zhou.

2. Lenias Mutasa.

3. Wilson Mhonyera.

4. Nkatazo Nyami.

5. Saul Mutepaire.

6. Zelma Yvonne Irish.

7. Richard William Irish.

8. Leonard Sibanda

9. George Dube.

10. Dumisani Moyo.

11. Lasta Nkala.

12. Evelyn Moyo.

Expert Evidence, Opinion Evidence and Toolmark Evidence re: Approach and the Limited Expert Knowledge of the Court

The State further produced a post-mortem report by a pathologist..., who recorded the following pertinent observations on the deceased.

1.) An adult skeletal human remains composing of fragmented skull. In conclusion stated; cause of death: Indeterminable incomplete skeletal remains...,.

Findings of Fact re: Witness Testimony, Candidness with the Court and Deceptive or Misleading Evidence


We find that the accused was not a truthful witness. The evidence which he led in court in trying to defend himself from the commission of the offence is hollow, and is rejected...,.

CHEDA J:     The accused is charged with murder which he pleaded not guilty.

            It is alleged that on the morning of 27 September 2007 he wrongfully, unlawfully and intentionally killed Martinus Jacobus Oosthuyse.

            The State led evidence from the following witnesses; Leornard Dube  and Kenneth Matanhire.   It is common cause that accused and one Collin Tsikidze who is still at large are former police officers.  On the 26th day of September 2007 accused and Collin Tsikidze invited Leonard Dube to the City Centre for a drink.  It is also common cause that at this time accused had already left the force while Collin Tsikidze was still a serving member. At around 0300 hours, they approached deceased who was resting and had parked his car at Pine Brothers Supermarket between Robert Mugabe way and G. Silundika Avenue, Bulawayo.

            It is the State case, that they identified themselves as Policemen and advised him that he was under arrest for wrong parking.  They forced him to drive to the Central Police station to pay a fine.  On their way they forced him to drive to a different direction altogether.  Upon noticing that he was being driven to a different direction, he stopped his motor vehicle and asked where he was being driven to, Collin Tsikidze produced a pistol and shot him once on the head and he died instantly.  They bundled his body and dumped it at Badminton Farm, Nyamandlovu.  His body together with his passport and a Lemonntra Quartz wrist watch was discovered on the 28th day of November 2007.  Accused was arrested on the 3rd day of November 2007 leading to the recovery of a BSAP 170 CZ pistol which is the same pistol that was used in the murder.

            The State called Leonard Dube whose evidence was that on the evening of the 25th day of September 2007, accused and his friend Collin Tsikidze arrived at his house and invited him to accompany them to town to look for money for beer.  When he enquired where they were going to look for money, Collin Tsikidze told him that, he was a police officer and as such he was going to arrest the Kombi drivers who drive without permits.  After patrolling the City Centre without making any arrest, he suggested that they go back home, but, accused refused and suggested that they go behind a place called Alabama near Khami bar.  During their search for traffic offenders, they eventually found deceased parked his car near Pine Brothers Supermarket at 8th Avenue/ R. Mugabe way.  Collin Tsikidze informed the deceased that he was under arrest and ordered him to go to the Police Station.  Deceased complied.   But, deceased was directed to drive to a different direction altogether.  Along the way he asked where they were going, but, accused rebuked him saying “keep quite”, a few minutes that accused shouted to Collin Tsikidze the following words,  “Lister finish off this person, finish so that we can go”.

            He also stated that he asked why he was giving such orders and accused responded, “Shut up, keep your mouth closed”.  At that juncture Collin Tsikidze produced a pistol.  Upon realizing this he opened the door and ran away and eventually found his way home after a Good Samaritan had given him bus fare.

            The following day the accused and Collin Tsikidze arrived and gave him R200 and were now driving deceased's motor vehicle. 

            This witness was confident and was not shaken under cross examine.  He impressed the court as an honest witness and such we have no reason to doubt his credibility and we therefore accept his evidence as a true reflection of what happened on this fateful day.

            The next witness was Kenneth Matanhire.  His evidence was that on the 17th October 2009 accused and Collin Tsikidze came to him and asked for money and he gave them R3500.  They introduced themselves as police officers from Pumula where his brother-in-law Ngoni Chasi was also working.  They left a Nissan Sentra with South African registration number plates as security and further signed an acknowledgement to that effect.  The acknowledgment was produced as Exhibit 5 and it bears the signatures of accused and Collin Tsikidze.

            The State sought and obtained admission of evidence from the defence of the following witness-

1.         Albert Zhou

2.         Lenias Mutasa

3.         Wilson Mhonyera

4.         Nkatazo Nyoni

5.         Saul Mutepaire

6.         Zelma Yvonne Irish

7.         Richard William Irish

8.         Leonard Sibanda

9.         George Dube

10.       Dumisani Moyo

11.       Lasta Nkala

12.       Evelyn Moyo

            The State further produced a postmortem report by a pathologist as Exhibit 4 who recorded the following pertinent observations on the deceased.

1)         An adult skeletal human remains composing of fragmented skull, in conclusion stated: cause of death: Indeterminable incomplete skeletal remains.

2)         The State then closed its case. 

            Accused gave evidence.  He stated that he is a former policeman and he knew Collin Tsikidze who is still at large as a policeman.  On the 26th September 2007 he met Collin Tsikidze at Pumula and suggested that they should go to town and he agreed.  On their way, they invited Leonard Dube to accompany them.  When they arrived in the city they walked around until they came across the deceased who had parked his car near Pines Brothers supermarket.  Collin Tsikidze advised deceased that he was under arrest for wrong parking and they ordered him to drive to the Central Police station.  However, Collin Tsikidze diverted him from the route to the Central Police station to a wrong direction altogether.   It is his further evidence that deceased stopped his car and he queried the direction he was now being asked to take.  At that juncture Collin Tsikidze produced a pistol and he shot deceased on the head once and he died.  It is also his evidence that Collin Tsikidze then placed deceased on the front passenger seat and he took charge of the motor vehicle.  They drove towards Nyamandlovu where they then dumped deceased.  Collin Tsikidze searched deceased and recovered R700 from which he was given R200.  They then drove back to Bulawayo.

            On the 3rd December 2007 he was in the city when he met Collin Tsikidze.  They discussed certain issues which are not relevant to the case but one important issue is that accused ended up in possession of Exhibit 9 (the pistol) and was later arrested still in possession of the said pistol.  We find that accused was not a truthful witness.  The evidence which he led in court in trying to defend himself from the commission of the offence is hollow and is rejected.  Both counsels have made their submissions to the court to which we are grateful.

            Collin Tsikidze is still at large.  In order to determine the guilt or otherwise of accused it is pertinent to examine his role in the commission of this crime.  Accused was in the company of Collin Tsikidze and they were looking for money.  He is a former policeman. Throughout the night they were looking for money through illegal means as he was no longer in the force and Collin Tsikidze was not on duty.  He knew that Collin Tsikidze was armed with a pistol.  They together made an illegal arrest of the deceased.

            Accused did notice that Collin Tsikidze had diverted deceased away from the police station route, but, he did not dissuade him from doing so.   When Leonard Dube asked him where they were going he rebuked him telling him to shut up.  When Collin Tsikidze produced a pistol he did not stop him.  He knew that the pistol is a lethal weapon and how dangerous it is.   Accused as a policeman, was trained in handling firearms.   He, nonetheless, did not attempt to stop his accomplice from using it.  He remained in the car after deceased had been shot in cold blood.  He accompanied Collin Tsikidze when he drove out of the city centre, and in his own words he assisted Collin Tsikidze to dump the body of the deceased along the road, during the night.  He also participated in sharing the loot.  He accompanied Collin Tsikidze back home.  He was also a signatory to the written loan agreement when they borrowed money from Kenneth Matanhire and gave deceased's motor vehicle as security.

            As if this was not enough, upon his arrest on the 3rd day of December 2007, he was found in possession of the same CZ pistol (Exhibit 9) which was used in the murder.

            All these factors are a clear testimony of accused's active participation in the commission of this offence.  All these chain of events leave indelible finger prints and signature of the accused.  We find that accused fully participated in the omission of this crime.

            He knew that Collin Tsikidze was armed before the shooting.   He did not dissociate himself like one Leonard Dube did.  He also continued to be part and parcel of what was going on.

            We reject accused version of events.

            We accordingly find that the state proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.  The accused is found guilty of murder with actual intent.

 

 

           

Criminal Division, Attorney General's Office, applicant's legal practitioners

Mashayamombe and company, respondent's legal practitioners
Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top