Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

HB101-09 - THE STATE vs FORGET NCUBE

  • View Judgment By Categories
  • View Full Judgment

Procedural Law-viz review.

Murder-viz infanticide re section 48(1)(a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23].
Sentencing-viz infanticide.
Sentencing-viz suspended sentence re non-mandatory sentence case.
Sentencing-viz community service re sentence below two years.
Sentencing-viz community service re sentence below two years iro non-mandatory sentence case.
Murder-viz infanticide re state of mind.
Murder -viz infanticide re diminished mental responsibility.
Murder-viz infanticide re diminished mental responsibility iro temporary madness.
Murder-viz infanticide re diminished mental responsibility iro  puerperal psychosis.
Sentencing-viz personal circumstances.

Murder re: Concealing Birth of a Child and Infanticide

This is a review judgment.

The accused is twenty-six years of age. She was charged with contravening section 48(1)(a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (Infanticide).

She pleaded guilty to the charge and was convicted.

The brief facts are that on the 5th day of January 2009, while she was nine months pregnant, she gave birth to a live baby in her bedroom without assistance from any person. She then strapped the baby on her back and walked to a dam where she threw the baby in it.

Sentencing re: Murder iro Concealing Birth of a Child and Infanticide

She was sentenced to two years imprisonment.

Two issues arise in this matter.

The first issue that arises is whether or not the trial magistrate has considered a suspended sentence.

The trial magistrate should have, at least, considered a suspended sentence.  

For the above reason, the sentence imposed by the trial court, in my view, is excessive in the circumstances and is set aside, and is accordingly substituted by the following –

“24 months imprisonment of which 6 months imprisonment is suspended on condition accused does not within that period contravening section 48(1)(a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] or an offence of which violence is an element for which, upon conviction, accused is sentenced to imprisonment without the option of a fine.

Effective – 18 months imprisonment.”

Sentencing re: Approach iro Extenuating Circumstances, Assessment of Blameworthiness & Effect on Mandatory Sentences


It is trite law that failure to consider the suspension of a prison term in a non-mandatory sentence case is a misdirection. On the same vein, failure to consider community service for a sentence below two years, where a mandatory sentence is not called for, is also a misdirection.

Defence of Diminished Mental Responsibility or Diminished Capacity re: Substance Use, Intoxication and Insanity

The second issue that arises is that the accused had just given birth, and, in that state, decided to kill it.

In a similar matter, in S v Ngwenya HB09-04, I emphasized the need to approach this type of offence from the basis of both a psychological and psychiatric point of view. The accused's state of mind is a recognized medical condition referred to as puerperal psychosis (temporary madness).

This condition, which the medical fraternity recognizes, affects most women immediately after birth.

This condition, in my view, together with the accused's personal circumstances, should have been a guiding principle in the determination of a suitable sentence.

Review Judgment

 

CHEDA J:        This is a review judgment.

Accused is 26 years of age.  She was charged with contravening section 48(1)(a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (Infanticide).

She pleaded guilty to the charge, was convicted and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment. 

The brief facts are that on the 5th day of January 2009 while she was 9 months pregnant, she gave birth to a live baby in her bedroom without assistance from any person.  She then strapped the baby on her back and walked to a dam where she threw the baby in it.  Two issues arise in this matter.  Firstly, whether or not the trial magistrate has considered a suspended sentence, it is now trite law that failure to consider the suspension of a prison term in a non-mandatory sentence case is a misdirection.  On the same vein, failure to consider community service for a sentence below 2 years where a mandatory sentence is not called for is also a misdirection.  The trial magistrate should have at least considered a suspended sentence.

Secondly, accused had just given birth to a live baby and in that state decided to kill it.  In a similar matter, in S v Ngwenya HB 9/04, I emphasized the need to approach this type of offence from the basis of both psychological and psychiatric point of view.  Accused's state of mind is a recognized medical condition referred to as puerperal psychosis, (temporary madness).

This condition which the medical fraternity recognizes, affects most women immediately after birth.  This condition, in my view, together with accused's personal circumstances should have been a guiding principle in the determination of a suitable sentence.

For the above reason the sentence imposed by the trial court in my view is excessive in the circumstances and is set aside and is accordingly substituted by the following:

“24 months imprisonment of which 6 months imprisonment is suspended on condition accused does not within that period contravening section 48(1)(a) of

the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (infanticide) or an offence of which violence is an element for which upon conviction accused is sentenced to imprisonment without the option of a fine.

 

Effective – 18 months imprisonment.”

 

 

 

 

Cheda J……………………………………………..

 

 

Kamocha J……………………………………………agrees
Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top