Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

HH296-14 - THE STATE vs SINSAMALA CHINSI

  • View Judgment By Categories
  • View Full Judgment


Murder-viz section 47 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23].
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re evidence on oath iro testimony in open court.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re physical evidence.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re corroborative evidence.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re expert evidence iro post mortem report.
Procedural Law-viz rules of evidence re admissions.
Murder-viz defence of diminished mental responsibility re intoxication.
Murder-viz defence of diminished mental responsibility re drug abuse.
Murder-viz murder with actual intent.

Murder re: Murder with Actual Intent, Dolus Directus and Murder Committed in Aggravating Circumstances

The accused is charged with murder as defined in section 47 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23].

The facts giving rise to the charge are by and large not in dispute. It is common cause that the accused is a 23 year old young man who was in the business of selling firewood and roasting green mealies. He, however, lived the life of a pest as he was entirely dependent on others for his subsistence while he squandered his money on drugs and pleasure. As at 3 January 2013, he was staying with his uncle at Number 3957 Matye Close, Budiriro 2. Fed up with the accused's exploitative habits, the uncle chased him away from his home that fateful day.

Finding himself homeless, the accused armed himself with a lethal kitchen knife he found on a kitchen rack outside a certain house and went out to rob people of their money and property. He then proceeded to Glenview 2 where he waylaid people along Patranda Road. He did not have a specific victim in mind but looked for soft targets at random. After some reconnaissance along the road he pounced on the deceased. He stabbed her in the chest and both hands thereby inflicting on her mortal injury. Thereafter, he robbed her of her cell phone, serial number 357904/04/550262/4, and two dollars. In his own words, this is what he had to say in his sworn evidence in open court:

“I was in control of my faculties during that time. As I was walking along the way I came to a place where there was a knife on a kitchen rack. I took the knife. When I took the knife, I intended to use it for stealing. I intended to scare people before I stole. I wanted to steal some money. I did not have a specific victim to target. I was just searching randomly. The reason was that I was desperate.

When I had taken the knife, I proceeded to Glenview 2. I then got into Patranda Way. I saw two women who were walking ahead of me. I then walked past them. I observed that the other woman had a pouch hanging around her neck. I was tempted to snatch that pouch. I then walked for a short distance. I then turned and went back to them. When I approached them I then snatched the pouch from the left side. I was not able to snatch the pouch because she resisted and we fell down on the road. I did not drag her considering that I was walking on the tarred road. The first witness was walking along the road and my hand actually passed in front of her as I was reaching for the deceased's pouch.

When I tried to snatch the pouch from the deceased, the string of the pouch got torn and the deceased grabbed my T-shirt as we were struggling against each other. I then pulled out the knife and stabbed her on the wrist but she did not let go. That is when I stabbed her on the shoulder and she let go. I stabbed her on the arm first and then on the shoulder. When I stabbed her on the shoulder that is when she let go of me. I then dropped the knife and ran away with the pouch.

My intention, when I stabbed the deceased, was for her to let me off so that I could escape. It never came to my mind that she could die. When I had escaped I then searched the pouch. I found that there was a cellphone, a juice card and two dollars. I then proceeded to Budiriro 1 where there were my friends. There were no bloodstains on my clothes. I did not tell anyone what had transpired.

Some police officers just came to Tichagarika as I was selling some maize cobs. I was actually surprised to see them coming. During that time I did not know why they were arresting me. When they produced the cellphone and enquired from me if I knew it, I then reflected and recollected what had transpired. I recalled how I had snatched the cell phone. I remembered the stabbing. When they informed me that the deceased had died I actually convicted myself and I was very much afraid. I did not intend to kill the deceased.

My Lord, I would want to sincerely apologize to the Court and her relatives about the incident that took her life.”…,.

Zodwa Mandiringa confirmed that she was in the company of the now deceased, Jean Chinounda, at around 9pm along Patranda Way, in Glenview 2, on their way to church, when the deceased was attacked and robbed of her cellphone in the manner described by the accused in court. They cried out for help. One Madzibaba Teddy Mandizvidza and others responded to her distress calls.

Madzibaba Teddy Mandizvidza corroborated her evidence in every material respect. There is no need to repeat his evidence….,.

After robbing the deceased of her cell phone, serial number 357904/04/550262/4, the accused pledged it to Godfrey Mafunga as security for a debt. Godfrey Mafunga, in turn, exchanged the phone with Sarudzai Munemo. Police investigations linked the cellphone to the accused who admitted pledging it to Godfrey Mafunga shortly after the commission of the murder. Godfrey Mafunga confirmed the pledge in every material respect….,.

The above evidence clearly establishes that the accused intentionally stabbed the deceased to death in the course of a robbery in the most brutish and barbaric manner. He raised no material issues in his defence as he convicted himself through his own mouth. That being the case, the conclusion that he is guilty of murder with actual intent is inescapable.

The accused is accordingly found guilty of murder with actual intent.

Physical Evidence re: Approach


The lethal knife that the accused used to stab the deceased was produced in evidence by consent as an exhibit. It was photographed and scanned against a ruler….,.

Expert Evidence, Opinion Evidence and Toolmark Evidence re: Approach and the Limited Expert Knowledge of the Court

The post mortem report is consistent with the attack perpetrated on the deceased by the accused.

It shows that the deceased was stabbed several times. As a result, she sustained two deep wounds on both arms measuring 2cm and 1.2cm long respectively. She also sustained a deep penetrating chest wound.

Death was diagnosed to be due to haemorrhagic shock due stab wound.

Defence of Diminished Mental Responsibility or Diminished Capacity re: Substance Use, Intoxication and Insanity

Although the accused raised the defence of intoxication and abuse of drugs, he openly confessed that he was in full control of all his faculties when he committed the horrific crime.

He deliberately set out to commit this despicable offence to avert self-imposed hardship in pursuit of cheap pleasure.

BHUNU J: The accused is charged with murder as defined in s 47 of the (Criminal Law Codification and Reform) Act [Cap 9:23]. The facts giving rise to the charge are by and large not in dispute. It is common cause that the accused is a 23 year old young man who was in the business of selling firewood and roasting green mealies. He however lived the life of a pest as he was entirely dependent on others for his subsistence while he squandered his money on drugs and pleasure.

 As at 3 January 2013 he was staying with his uncle at number 3957 Matye Close Budiriro 2. Fed up with the accused's exploitative habits the uncle chased him away from his home that fateful day.

Finding himself homeless, the accused armed himself with a lethal kitchen knife he found on a kitchen rack outside a certain house and went out to rob people of their money and property. He then proceeded to Glenview 2 where he way-laid people along Patranda road. He did not have a specific victim in mind but looked for soft targets at random. After some reconnaissance along the road he pounced on the deceased. He stabbed her in the chest and both hands thereby inflicting on her mortal injury. Thereafter he robbed her of her cell phone serial number 357904/04/550262/4 and two dollars.  In his own words this is what he had to say in his sworn evidence in open Court: 

“I was in control of my faculties during that time. As I was walking along the way I came to a place where there was a knife on a kitchen rack. I took the knife. When I took the knife, I intended to use it for stealing. I intended to scare people before I stole. I wanted to steal some money. 

I did not have a specific victim to target. I was just searching randomly. The reason was that I was desperate. 

When I had taken the knife I proceeded to Glenview 2. I then got into Patranda Way. I saw two women who were walking ahead of me. I then walked past them. I observed that the other woman had a pouch hanging around her neck. I was tempted to snatch that pouch. I then walked for a short distance. I then turned and went back to them. When I approached them I then snatched the pouch from the left side. I was not able to snatch the pouch because she resisted and we fell down on the road. I did not drag her considering that I was walking on the tarred road. The first witness was walking along the road and my hand actually passed in front of her as I was reaching for the deceased's pouch. 

When I tried to snatch the pouch from the deceased the string of the pouch got torn and the deceased grabbed my T-shirt as we were struggling against each other. 

I then pulled out the knife and stabbed her on the wrist but she did not let go. That is when I stabbed her on the shoulder and she let go. I stabbed her on the arm first and then on the shoulder. When I stabbed her on the shoulder that is when she let go of me. I then dropped the knife and ran away with the pouch. 

My intention when I stabbed the deceased was for her to let me off so that I could escape. It never came to my mind that she could die. When I had escaped I then searched the pouch. I found that there was a cell phone, a juice card and two dollars. I then proceeded to Budiriro 1 where there were my friends. There were no blood stains on my clothes. I did not tell anyone what had transpired. 

Some police officers just came to Tichagarika as I was selling some maize cobs.  I was actually surprised to see them coming. During that time I did not know why they were arresting me. When they produced the cell phone and enquired from me if I knew it, I then reflected and recollected what had transpired. 

I recalled how I had snatched the cell phone. I remembered the stabbing. When they informed me that the deceased had died I actually convicted myself and I was very much afraid. I did not intend to kill the deceased. 

 My Lord I would want to sincerely apologize to the Court and her relatives about the incident that took her life.” 

The lethal knife that the accused used to stab the deceased was produced in evidence by consent as an exhibit. It was photographed and scanned against a ruler. The image gives a graphic chilling illustration of a murderous weapon as appears in the picture below.

  

 Zodwa Mandiringa confirmed that she was in the company of the now deceased Jean Chinounda at around 9 pm along Patranda Way in Glenview 2 on their way to church when the deceased was attacked and robbed of her cell phone in the manner described by the accused in Court. They cried out for help. One Madzibaba Teddy Mandizvidza and others responded to her distress calls. Madzibaba Teddy Mandizvidza corroborated her evidence in every material respect. There is no need to repeat his evidence.

The post mortem report is consistent with the attack perpetrated on the deceased by the accused. It shows that the deceased was stabbed several times. As a result she sustained two deep wounds on both arms measuring 2 cm and 1.2 cm long respectively. She also sustained a deep penetrating chest wound. Death was diagnosed to be due to haemorrhagic shock due stab wound.

After robbing the deceased of her cell phone serial number 357904/04/550262/4 the accused pledged it to Godfrey Mafunga as security for a debt. Mafunga in turn exchanged the phone with Sarudzai Munemo. Police investigations linked the cell phone to the accused who admitted pledging it to Godfrey Mafunga shortly after the commission of the murder. Godfrey Mafunga confirmed the pledge in every material respect. Although the accused raised the defence of intoxication and abuse of drugs he openly confessed that he was in full control of all his faculties when he committed the horrific crime. He deliberately set out to commit this despicable offence to avert self imposed hardship in pursuit of cheap pleasure.

The above evidence clearly establishes that the accused intentionally stabbed the deceased to death in the course of a robbery in the most brutish and barbaric manner. He raised no material issues in his defence as he convicted himself through his own mouth. That being the case, the conclusion that he is guilty of murder with actual intent is inescapable. The accused is accordingly found guilty of murder with actual intent.

 

 

 The Prosecutor General's Office, the State's legal practitioners.

Matipano and Matimba, defendant's legal practitioners.
Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top