Law Portal
Zimbabwe

Welcome To Law Portal

Welcome, Guest!
[Help?]

HB09-10 - EMMANUEL JUWAKI and PROSPER MAPHOSA vs THE STATE

  • View Judgment By Categories
  • View Full Judgment

Bail-viz armed robbery.

Bail-viz co-accused re principle of equality of treatment.
Bail-viz set down of trial date.
Bail-viz likelihood to abscond.
Bail-viz risk of the accused committing similar offences.
Bail-viz propensity to abscond.
Bail-viz evidence of identification.
Bail-viz evidence of identification re strength of the State case.
Bail-viz physical evidence.

Bail re: Approach iro Accomplices, Co-Accused Persons, Gender Considerations & the Principle of Equality of Treatment

The applicants are jointly charged with armed robbery together with one Tafadzwa Chancellor Tandi. Their co-accused, Tafadzwa Chancellor Tandi, was granted bail by my sister Judge MAVANGIRA sitting at the High Court, Harare.

The State is opposing bail in respect of the applicants.

The first applicant faces several other similar offences. That is not the case with the second applicant.  The application was made some ten days before the trial date set down in the Regional Court.

There is a likelihood that the applicants will abscond and not stand their trial. Further, there is a likelihood that they will commit similar offences as they have already shown a propensity to do so.

The second applicant was found in possession of the stolen cell phone. Both applicants were identified by the complainant.

They are not suitable candidates for bail and they are accordingly refused bail.

Bail re: Robbery, Armed Robbery, Robbery Committed in Aggravating Circumstances and the Doctrine of Recent Possession


The facts are that the applicants and their accomplice went to the complainant's residence and claimed to be police detectives. They were armed with a pistol. The complainant demanded that they identify themselves. They became violent and produced the pistol and force-marched him into the house demanding gold. They ransacked the house and robbed him and his employee of three (3) cell phones, a digital scale and ZAR221,000= cash.

NDOU J:          The applicants are jointly charged with armed robbery together with one Tafadzwa Chancellor Tandi.  Their co-accused Tandi was granted bail by my sister Judge MAVANGIRA sitting at the High Court, Harare.  The state is opposing bail in respect of the applicants.  The first applicant faces several other similar offences.  That is not the case with the second applicant.  The application was made some ten days before the trial date set down in the regional court.

The facts are that the applicants and their accomplice went to the complainant residence and claimed to be police detectives.  They were armed with a pistol.  The complainant demanded that they identify themselves.  They became violent and produced the pistol and force-marched him into the house demanding gold.  They ransacked the house and robbed him and his employee three (3) cell phones, a digital scale and ZAR221 000,00 cash.                      

There is a likelihood that the applicants will abscond and not stand their trial.  Further, there is a likelihood that they will commit similar offences as they have already shown a propensity to do so.

            The second applicant was found in possession of the stolen cell phone.  Both applicants were identified by the complainant.  They are not suitable candidates for bail and they are accordingly refused bail.


Back Main menu

Categories

Back to top