CHEDA J: This
matter was referred to me on review as is the usual procedure.
Accused was charged with
contravening section 10 of the Copper control Act [Chapter 14:06] commonly
referred to as “Failure to give satisfactory account of possession of copper”.
The allegations against the accused
are that on the 21st January 2011 at Beitbridge Border post he was
found in possession of 197.2kgs of copper.
He failed to give a satisfactory answer regarding his possession thereof
to the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority resulting in the seizure of the said copper.
He pleaded guilty to the offence and
was sentenced to $400 or 4 months imprisonment.
I noticed that the accused was
sentenced without the court having had sight of the notice of seizure from
(Zimra) Zimbabwe Revenue Authority. It
was important as it is a necessary requirement that the court be in possession of
such information as it is through it, that the court would know the value of
the copper and/or potential prejudice suffered by the complainant.
To sentence the accused without such
information is a serious misdirection on the part of the learned trial
magistrate. Therefore, to allow it to stand
will be a miscarriage of justice.
In my opinion this cannot be allowed
to stand and accordingly the following order is made:
(1) The conviction is confirmed but the
sentence is set aside.
(2) The matter is referred
back for sentence before the same magistrate to consider sentence in accordance
with the provisions of the copper Act [Chapter 14:06] and decided cases.
Kamocha
J agrees..........................................................
